1. Naglieri JA. The discrepancy/consistency approach to SLD identification using the PASS theory. En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 145-171.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Fifth edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
3. Naglieri J, Feifer S. Pattern of strengths and weaknesses made easy: The discrepancy-consistency method. En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2018.    
4. World Health Organization. Clasificación estadística internacional de enfermedades y problemas relacionados con la salud [Statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: Tenth revision; ICD-10; WHO Version for 2016; Internet]. Recuperado de: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/6282/Volume1.pdf?sequence=1
5. Ardila A, Roselli M, Matute E. Discalculia. Neuropsicología de los trastornos de aprendizaje. México: Editorial El Manual Moderno; 2005. p. 49-60.
6. Goldstein S, Schwebach A. Neuropsychological basis of learning disabilities. En: Reynolds CR, Fletcher-Janzen E, editores. Handbook of clinical child neuropsychology. Nueva York: Springer; 2009. p. 187–201.
7. Cortiella C, Horowitz, SH. The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities; 2014. Disponible en: https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014-State-of-LD.pdf
8. Sahoo M, Biswas H, Padhy S. Psychological co-morbidity in children with specific learning disorders. J Fam Med Primary Care. 2015;4(1): 21-25.
9. Characteristics of children with learning disabilities [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.naset.org/fileadmin/user_upload/LD_Report/Issue__3_LD_Report_Characteristic_of_LD.pdf
10. Blake J, Lund E, Zhou Q, Kwok O, Benz M. National prevalence rates of bully victimization among students with disabilities in the United States. Sch Psychol Q. 2012;27(4):210-222.
11. Rose C, Espelage D, Monda-Amaya L, Shogren K, Aragon S. Bullying and middle school students with and without specific learning disabilities: An examination of social-ecological predictors. ‎J Learn Disabil. 2015;48(3):239-254.
12. Pandy RI. Learning Disabilities and Self-Esteem. (2012). All Capstone Projects. 133. Disponible en: http://opus.govst.edu/capstones/133. 
13. Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB. The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev. 2011; 82:405–432. 
14. Bonifacci P, Storti M, Tobia V, Suardi A. Specific learning disorders: A look inside children’s and parents’ psychological well-being and relationships. J Learn Disabil. 2016;49(5):532-545. 
15. Yáñez Téllez G. Trastorno específico del aprendizaje: Con dificultades en la lectura [Libro Kindle]. En: Yáñez Téllez G, editores. Neuropsicología de los trastornos del neurodesarrollo. Hipódromo, C. P., México, D.C.: Editorial Manual Moderno; 2016. Libro Kindle ubicación 929-1404.
16. Vellutino F, Fletcher J, Snowling M, Scanlon D. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45(1):2-40.
17. Torppa M, Parrilla R, Niemi P, Poikkeus AM, Lerkkanen MK, Nurmi JE.  The double deficit hypothesis in the transparent Finnish orthography: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. Read Writ. 2013;26(8):1353-1380.
18. Naglieri JA, Otero TM. The cognitive assessment system-2: From theory to practice. En: Flanagan DP, Harrison PL, editores. Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press; en prensa.
19. Báez Reyes MM. Estudio exploratorio para evaluar la posibilidad de modificación cognoscitiva en niños y niñas con dificultades en la lectura: Aplicación del modelo neuropsicológico PASS. [disertación doctoral] Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras; 2005.
20. Cordero G. Eficacia de una intervención neurocognitiva para estudiantes con inatención, hiperactividad y dificultades en lectura. [disertación doctoral]. Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras; 2017.
21. Naglieri JA, Otero T, DeLauder B, Matto, H. Bilingual hispanic children’s performance on the english and spanish versions of the cognitive assessment system. Sch Psychol Q. 2007; 22:432–448. 
22. Nicolson R, Fawcett AJ, Dean P. Dyslexia, development and cerebellum. Trends Neurosci. 2001; 24:515-516.
23. Naglieri JA, Otero T. Interpretation. En: Naglieri JA, Otero T, editores. Essentials of CAS2 assessment. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2017. p.107-119.
24. Matute E, Ardila A, Rosselli M. Trastorno de la expresión escrita. En: Rosselli M, Matute E, Ardila A, editores. Neuropsicología del desarrollo infantil. Deleg, Cuauhtémoc, México, D.C.: Editorial Manual Moderno; 2010. p. 161-180.   
25. Rosselli M, Matute E, Ardila A. Predictores neuropsicológicos de la lectura en español. Rev Neurol. 2006; 42, 202-210.
26. Feifer S, Della Tofallo DA. Integrating RTI with cognitive neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. Middletown, MD: School Neuropsychology Press; 2007.
27. Feifer S. How SLD manifests in reading. En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011.  p. 21-41.
28. Boix C, Colomé R, López A, Sanguinetti, A. Trastornos de aprendizaje: Dislexia, discalculia y disgrafia. En: Enseñat A, Roig A, García A, editores. Neuropsicología pediátrica. España: Editorial Síntesis; 2015. p. 101-118.
29. Feder K, Majnemer A. Handwriting development, competency, and intervention.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49:312-317.
30. Volman MJ, Schendel BM, Jongmans MJ. Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: a search for underlying mechanisms. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60(4):451-60.
31. Mather N, Wendling B. How SLD manifests in writing. En: Kaufman AS, Kaufman ND, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 65-87.
32. Yáñez Téllez G. Trastorno específico del aprendizaje: Con dificultades en las matemáticas [Libro Kindle].  En: Yáñez Téllez G, editores. Neuropsicología de los trastornos del neurodesarrollo. Hipódromo, C. P., México, D.C.: Editorial Manual Moderno; 2016. Libro Kindle ubicación 1407-1832.
33. Geary D, Hoard M, Bailey D. How SLD manifests in mathematics. En: Kaufman AS, Kaufman ND, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 43-64. 
34. Rotzer S, Kucian K, Martin E, von Aster M, Klavel P, Leonneker T. Optimized voxel-based morphometry in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuroimage. 2008; 1:417-422.
35. Dehaene S. The new cognitive neurosciences. Cerebral bases of number processing and calculation. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000. 
36. Dehaene, S. Número. En: Houdé O, Kayser D, Koening O, Proust, J, Waltz, V, Cavé C, editores.  Diccionario de ciencias cognitivas: Neurociencia, psicología, inteligencia artificial, lingüística y filosofía.  Buenos Aires; 2003.  
37. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 USCA §1401 (2004).
38. Sotelo M, Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC. Overview of specific learning disabilities. En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 1-19. 
39. U.S. Office of Education. First annual report of National Advisory Committee on Handicapped Children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1968. Disponible en http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED018058.pdf 
40. Moreno-Torres MA.  Hacia un modelo neurocognitivo para la evaluación psicológica: Implicaciones para el desarrollo de intervenciones en poblaciones escolares.  En: Congreso Interamericano de Psicología: Julio 2013, Brasilia, Brasil.  
41. Flanagan DP, Ortiz SO, Alfonso VC, Dynda AM.  Integration of response-to-intervention and norm-referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the tower of Babel. Psychol Sch. 2006;43: 807-825. 
42. Naglieri JA, Crockett D. Response to Intervention (RTI): Is it a scientifically proven method? Communiqué. 2005;34: 38-39.
43. Berninger VW. Evidence-based differential diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities with and without comorbidities in oral language, writing, and math: Prevention, problem-solving consultation, and specialized instruction. En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 203-231.
44. Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, Mascolo JT. A CHC-based operational definition of SLD: Integrating multiple data sources and multiple data-gathering methods.  En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 233-297.
45. Hale JB, Wycoff KL, Fiorello, CA. RTI and cognitive hypothesis testing for identification and intervention of specific learning disabilities: The best of both worlds.  En: Flanagan DP, Alfonso VC, editores. Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011. p. 173-201.
46. Das JP, Naglieri J, Kirby J. Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence.  Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1994.
47. Luria AR. Human brain and psychological processes. New York: Harper and Row; 1966. 
48. Luria AR. The working brain. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
49. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man (2nd Ed.). New York: Basic Books; 1980.
50. Luria AR. Language and cognition.  New York: Wiley; 1982
51. Naglieri JA, Das JP, Goldstein S. Cognitive Assessment System (2nd ed.). ProEd; 2014a.  
52. Naglieri JA, Moreno MA, Otero T. Cognitive Assessment System (2nd ed.)- Español. ProEd; 2017.
53. Naglieri JA, Das JP, Goldstein S. Cognitive Assessment System (2nd ed.)- Brief. ProEd; 2014b.
54. Naglieri JA, Das JP, Goldstein S. Cognitive Assessment System (2nd ed.)- Rating Scale. ProEd; 2014c.
55. Reinstein DK, Burau DE. Integrating neuropsychological and psychological evaluations: Assessing and helping the whole child. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. 2014.
56. Moreno M, Torres Y. Evaluación neuropsicológica e intervención con la niñez y la juventud.  Memorias simposio temático de la Asociación de Psicología de Puerto Rico. (en prensa).
57. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment –5th edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.
58. Miller DC.  Essentials of school neuropsychological assessment 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2013.
59. Rigau E, García K, Enseñat A. Valoración neuropsicológica pediátrica. En: Enseñat A, Roig A, García A, editores. Neuropsicología pediátrica, Editorial Síntesis: España; 2015. p. 235-252.
60. Mirsky AF. Disorders of attention: A neuropsychological perspective. En: Lyon GR, Krasnegor NA, editores. Attention, memory, and executive function Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1996. p. 71–95.
61. Mirsky AF, Anthony BJ, Duncan CC, Ahearn MB, Kellam, SG. Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychol Rev. 1991; 2:109–145.
62. Miller DC, Maricle DE. The emergence of neuropsychological constructs into tests of intelligence and cognitive abilities. En: Flanagan DP, Harrison PL, editores. Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York, NY: Guilford Press. 2012. p. 800-819.
63. Dawson P, Guare R. Smart but scattered: The revolutionary ‘executive skills’ approach to helping kids reach their potential. New York, NY: Guilford Press. 2009.
64. Torres Y. Traducción y adaptación cultural del Cognitive Assessment System 2-Rating Scale: Equivalencia semántica y de contenido. [disertación doctoral]. Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, Puerto Rico; 2015.
65. Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. BRIEF: Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. 2000.
66. Naglieri JA, Goldstein S. Comprehensive Executive Function Inventory. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. 2013
67. Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RH.  Behavior Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC™-3). NY: Pearson. 2015.
68. Bauermeister JJ, Vargas I, Colberg C, González LE, Carroll J. Development of the Inventario de Comportamiento Escolar (IDCE) for Puerto Rican children. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987; 9:49-67.
69. García J. Introducción a la estimulación cognitiva. En: García J. Estimulación cognitiva. Departamento de Psicología Básica y Metodología. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Murcia; 2009. p. 1-20.
70. Bergman-Nutley S, Klingberg T. Effect of working memory training on working memory, arithmetic and following instructions. Psychol Res. 2014; 78(6):869-877.
71. Betancour Caro ML, Molina DA, Cañizales Romaña LY. Entrenamiento cognitivo de las funciones ejecutivas en la edad escolar. Rev Latinoam Cienc Soc Niñez Juv.  2016;14(1):359-368. 
72. Sanabria LB, Valencia NG, Ibañez J. Efecto del entrenamiento en autoregulación para el aprendizaje de la matemática. Prax & Saber. 2016;8(16):35-56.
73. Malhotra S, Rajender G, Sharma V, Singh TB. Efficacy of cognitive retraining techniques in children with learning disability. Delhi Psychiatry J. 2009;12(1):100-106.
74. Nisha V, Kumar KB. The efficacy of computer assisted cognitive training in the remediation of specific learning disorders. Int J Scientific Res Publ. 2016;3(3):1-4
75. Stelzer F, Cervigni MA, Mazzoni C. Programas de entrenamiento cognitivo de la memoria de trabajo: Un análisis comparativo de estudios en niños. Rev Puertorriquena Psicol. 2013;24(2):1-17.
76. Melby Lerva ̊g M, Hulme C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. ‎Dev Psychol. 2013; 49:270–291.
77. Otero T, Barker L, Naglieri J. Executive function treatment and intervention in schools. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2014;3(3):205-214. 
78. Naglieri JA, Pickering E. Helping children learn: Intervention handouts for use in school and at home. (2nd edition). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co; 2010.
79. Naglieri JA, Feifer S. Intervention. En: Naglieri JA, Otero T. Essentials of CAS2 assessment. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2016. p. 147-180.
80. Das JP. PASS Reading Enhancement Program. Deal, New Jersey, EE. UU: Sarka Educational Resources; 1999. 
81. Carlson J, Das J. A Process approach to remediating word-decoding deficiencies in chapter 1 children. ‎Learn Disabil Q. 1997;20(2):93.
82. Papadopoulos T, Charalambous A, Kanari A, Loizou M. Kindergarten cognitive intervention for reading difficulties: The PREP remediation in Greek. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2004;19(1):79-105.
83. Wendling B, Mather N. Essentials of evidence-based academic interventions. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2009. 
84. Kulman R. Playing smarter in a digital world: A guide to choosing and using popular video games and apps to improve executive functioning in children and teens. Plantation, FL: Specialty Press Inc; 2014.
85. González A. Modificación cognitiva enfocada en procesos cognitivos de atención y planificación en estudiantes con Trastorno por Déficit de Atención e Hiperactividad (TDAH). [diseración doctoral]. Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, Puerto Rico; 2016.

Medina N. Estudio sobre la modificación cognitiva en niños con dificultades en la lectura y Trastorno por Déficit de Atención e Hiperactividad tipo combinado. [diseración doctoral]. Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras; 2007.